Archive for the ‘Industry Watchdog’ Category

We Need Our Environmental Reporters!

Posted in Environmental Services Industry, Industry Watchdog by

Tyler Hamilton is dead-on. Environmental journalism cannot be allowed to become a victim to the political theater that had denigrated so many of the topics which are so vital for each of us individually and worldwide.

Unfortunately, that does not mean that environmental reporters will become any less of an endangered species within the world of mainstream media. But the medium may need to change; specifically it’s future could be in the business community where large and small businesses devote most or all of their efforts into improving air quality, water quality, wildlife and natures habitat.

The message from those with the expertise, companies both large and small, may best be delivered in the actions they take. These companies can explain the complex issues and more importantly make the case for the solutions. Their value will be in solving the air and water quality issues, not just talking about them.

Midwest for example, is a small company specializing in environmental services, able to provide many valuable solutions; that’s almost the easy part. The hard part is being able to communicate the value in a way that actually argues the case that the solution does not “cost” but pays dividends in the overall quality of life.

This communications expertise is needed by those of us in business who have great solutions. Maybe we need to hire the Tyler Hamilton’s of this world to help tell our stories.

View Comments

Buyer Beware

Posted in Dust Control, Environmental Services Industry, Industry Watchdog, Soil Sement, Soil Stabilization by

I would like to share an interesting story with you. It represents an example of why I believe independent testing of company claims is very important for the purchasers of products from companies within our industry – during the bidding stage, and then again during the delivery stage.

For many years we have been supplying a customer with their requirements for a dust palliative and soil stabilizer. Our multi-year contract just expired and the user has issued a notice of solicitation for current bids to fulfill their requirements. Their solicitation included a detailed performance requirement for the product to pass CBR lab testing for a specific soil type to meet the standards for the customer’s needs. The specification matched our specific product, which they have been using for many years.

In the bidding, a competitor quoted a price approximately 20% below our quoted price. Part of the competitive vendor’s bid information included marketing and test data to prove that their product was equal to the product called for in the specification.

Shortly after the competitor was awarded the new multi-year contract for the delivery and installation of their brand name product, based on being the low bidder, they began communicating with producers of the basic raw materials stating they had just received a multi-year contract and needed to source significant volumes of a non-prime polymer emulsion. Within these communications there was no product chemistry specification that might indicate that what they were trying to source would meet the requirements as called for by the purchaser’s specification.

So here is the issue; since testing and documentation for the specification requirements is typically only required at the bidding stage, and product sampling is NOT required at the delivery stage to assure the exact product specified in the bid is being delivered, the bait and switch can take place and the customer will never know.

It will take due diligence on the part of the customer to catch this bait and switch activity. It will also take significant due diligence to confirm that the environmental soundness of whatever is actually delivered and installed on public roadways is in fact what was represented.

We know that price is an issue and customers need to assure their constituencies that they have done everything possible to obtain the best product solution for the lowest price. We also know customers do not want to “buy price” and close their eyes to product deficiency and possible environmental issues.

This is why it is in the best interest of both the community of users and principled industry leaders to expose such bait and switch activities. This is needed for both the protection of people and the environment in which these products might be used.

View Comments